Benchmarking Intelligent Agents for Visual Food Recognition Against Manual Logging

Primary Investigator (PI) Name

Maria Valero

Department

CCSE - Computer Science

Abstract

Accurate dietary tracking is crucial for nutrition management, but manual food logging can be time-consuming. This study benchmarks intelligent vision agents from Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI against MyFitnessPal user logs to assess their accuracy in food recognition and macronutrient estimation. We evaluate performance based on precision, recall, and mean absolute error (MAE) for calories, protein, carbohydrates, and fats.

Beyond accuracy, we analyze usability concerns, including ease of use, error correction, and adaptability to complex meals. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of AI-driven tracking compared to manual logging, providing insights into the future of automated nutrition assessment.

Disciplines

Computer Engineering | Nutrition

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Benchmarking Intelligent Agents for Visual Food Recognition Against Manual Logging

Accurate dietary tracking is crucial for nutrition management, but manual food logging can be time-consuming. This study benchmarks intelligent vision agents from Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI against MyFitnessPal user logs to assess their accuracy in food recognition and macronutrient estimation. We evaluate performance based on precision, recall, and mean absolute error (MAE) for calories, protein, carbohydrates, and fats.

Beyond accuracy, we analyze usability concerns, including ease of use, error correction, and adaptability to complex meals. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of AI-driven tracking compared to manual logging, providing insights into the future of automated nutrition assessment.