Using Peer Review to Open Doors: Collaborative Community Review as Intervention Point
Presentation Type
Presentation
Start Date
9-4-2026 3:30 PM
End Date
9-4-2026 4:00 PM
Description
Traditional peer review can be hierarchical and serve a gate-keeping function rather than fostering development of work. Collaborative Community Review (CCR) is a form of open peer review that serves as a point of intervention against this and reframes this orientation with an explicit focus on fostering collegial and collaborative review. As such, CCR focuses on opening doors: both in terms of peer review and fostering development of work, as well as in regards to academic publishing more broadly.
This presentation will explore how CCR can serve as a point of intervention to reopen doors in the academy. It will also explore points of crossover and intervention for open access and collaborative work more broadly—discussing examples of the CCR process and platforms built to support open review across a variety of use cases. In so doing, it will argue that centering dialogue and collegiality are core to a more open and inclusive approach to both publishing, and wider academic engagement in a variety of forms. As such it will advance the argument that CCR also functions as a site of both pedagogical and community practice.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Using Peer Review to Open Doors: Collaborative Community Review as Intervention Point
Traditional peer review can be hierarchical and serve a gate-keeping function rather than fostering development of work. Collaborative Community Review (CCR) is a form of open peer review that serves as a point of intervention against this and reframes this orientation with an explicit focus on fostering collegial and collaborative review. As such, CCR focuses on opening doors: both in terms of peer review and fostering development of work, as well as in regards to academic publishing more broadly.
This presentation will explore how CCR can serve as a point of intervention to reopen doors in the academy. It will also explore points of crossover and intervention for open access and collaborative work more broadly—discussing examples of the CCR process and platforms built to support open review across a variety of use cases. In so doing, it will argue that centering dialogue and collegiality are core to a more open and inclusive approach to both publishing, and wider academic engagement in a variety of forms. As such it will advance the argument that CCR also functions as a site of both pedagogical and community practice.