Benchmarking Intelligent Agents for Visual Food Recognition Against Manual Logging

Disciplines

Computer Engineering | Nutrition

Abstract (300 words maximum)

Accurate dietary tracking is crucial for nutrition management, but manual food logging can be time-consuming. This study benchmarks intelligent vision agents from Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI against MyFitnessPal user logs to assess their accuracy in food recognition and macronutrient estimation. We evaluate performance based on precision, recall, and mean absolute error (MAE) for calories, protein, carbohydrates, and fats.

Beyond accuracy, we analyze usability concerns, including ease of use, error correction, and adaptability to complex meals. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of AI-driven tracking compared to manual logging, providing insights into the future of automated nutrition assessment.

Academic department under which the project should be listed

CCSE - Computer Science

Primary Investigator (PI) Name

Maria Valero

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Benchmarking Intelligent Agents for Visual Food Recognition Against Manual Logging

Accurate dietary tracking is crucial for nutrition management, but manual food logging can be time-consuming. This study benchmarks intelligent vision agents from Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI against MyFitnessPal user logs to assess their accuracy in food recognition and macronutrient estimation. We evaluate performance based on precision, recall, and mean absolute error (MAE) for calories, protein, carbohydrates, and fats.

Beyond accuracy, we analyze usability concerns, including ease of use, error correction, and adaptability to complex meals. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of AI-driven tracking compared to manual logging, providing insights into the future of automated nutrition assessment.