Numbers with Four Close Factorizations

Primary Investigator (PI) Name

Dr. Tsz Chan

Department

CSM – Mathematics

Abstract

Consider n = 99, 990, 000, a number that has two close factorizations: 10, 000 · 9, 999 and 11, 000 · 9, 090. Generalizing this to k close factorizations, we have n = AB = (A + a_1)(B − b_1) = (A + a_2)(B − b_2) = · · · = (A + a_{k−1})(B − b_{k−1}) where 1 ≤ B ≤ A as well as 1 ≤ a_1 < a_2 < · · · < a_{k−1} ≤ C and 1 ≤ b_1 < b_2 < · · · < b_{k−1} ≤ C. Here, C is our closeness measure. Our faculty mentor, Dr. Tsz Chan, previously studied numbers with three close factorizations and identified an optimal ratio R_3 = A / C^3 ≤ 0.25. The scope of our project this summer was to expand on his work and study numbers with four close factorizations. The optimal closeness ratio here was calculated to be R_4 = A / C^3 ≤ (6+√ 6) / 9(2+√ 6)^2 = 0.04742.... Arriving at this ratio involved proving identities and inequalities, deducing intermediate lemmas, transforming our original question into a generalized Pell-type equation, determining which numbers should be entered into that equation, and eliminating cases that we knew would yield no solutions.

Disciplines

Number Theory

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 

Numbers with Four Close Factorizations

Consider n = 99, 990, 000, a number that has two close factorizations: 10, 000 · 9, 999 and 11, 000 · 9, 090. Generalizing this to k close factorizations, we have n = AB = (A + a_1)(B − b_1) = (A + a_2)(B − b_2) = · · · = (A + a_{k−1})(B − b_{k−1}) where 1 ≤ B ≤ A as well as 1 ≤ a_1 < a_2 < · · · < a_{k−1} ≤ C and 1 ≤ b_1 < b_2 < · · · < b_{k−1} ≤ C. Here, C is our closeness measure. Our faculty mentor, Dr. Tsz Chan, previously studied numbers with three close factorizations and identified an optimal ratio R_3 = A / C^3 ≤ 0.25. The scope of our project this summer was to expand on his work and study numbers with four close factorizations. The optimal closeness ratio here was calculated to be R_4 = A / C^3 ≤ (6+√ 6) / 9(2+√ 6)^2 = 0.04742.... Arriving at this ratio involved proving identities and inequalities, deducing intermediate lemmas, transforming our original question into a generalized Pell-type equation, determining which numbers should be entered into that equation, and eliminating cases that we knew would yield no solutions.