Date of Submission
Summer 7-20-2020
Degree Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy in International Conflict Management (Ph.D. INCM)
Committee Chair/First Advisor
Joseph G. Bock, Ph.D.
Committee Member
David Carroll, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Sherrill Hayes, Ph.D.
Committee Member
Dr. Marcus Marktanner
Abstract
As elections are increasingly plagued by malpractice, violence, systemic manipulation, and corruption, electoral administrators worldwide view Information and Communication Technology (ICT)-based solutions as convenient and cost-effective in enhancing electoral integrity. ICT optimists contend that digitization enhances efficiency, speed, and detectability of fraud and manipulation, and thereby improves the quality of elections. ICT skeptics, however, argue that digitization reduces voters’ confidence in elections as these technologies are susceptible to new vulnerabilities such as hacking, breakdown, and programmatic manipulation. While arguments on both sides are appealing, there has been very little systematic effort to empirically test these assertations. This dissertation partially fills this void and uses a multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic model to assess whether or not the usage of ICTs in four aspects of the electoral process – voter registration, voter identification, election result processing, and publication of results – improves perceived electoral integrity. The analysis reveals mixed evidence of both hope and hype. The findings indicate that countries using “biometric data” in voter identification at polling stations are more likely to have elections with higher levels of perceived electoral integrity. Contrastingly, countries using “electronic tabulation” for processing results are more likely to have elections with decreased levels of perceived electoral integrity.
Included in
International and Area Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons