12:00:53 From Rachel Yeates to Everyone:
	Please ask questions in the chat.
	You can access slides at our All Things Open homepage.
	This session will be recorded, captioned, and posted to our All Things Open homepage soon. (https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ato/2022openaccess/)
12:08:04 From Kristina Clement to Everyone:
	Charlotte’s article: https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/25362/33246
12:10:36 From Kristina Clement to Everyone:
	elife: https://elifesciences.org/inside-elife/00f2f185/elife-latest-preprints-and-peer-review
12:11:12 From James Ready to Everyone:
	There is a big push on publish everything, then post-publication review (as just mentioned).
12:11:29 From Charlotte Roh to Everyone:
	https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2
12:19:58 From Amy Hofer (she/her) to Everyone:
	Thanks for being so open about the fear. I can relate!
12:22:17 From Charlotte Roh to Everyone:
	I’ve found this article on open peer review helpful to share with those who are new to the concept: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437951/
12:26:31 From Callas, Jennie to Everyone:
	will the chat be saved and posted afterward, so the links are included?
12:27:41 From Rachel Yeates to Everyone:
	Yes, we will collect the links to post alongside the recording.
12:32:09 From James Ready to Everyone:
	My university just started a journal and the first issue had four articles; three of which had errors in data analysis.
12:33:21 From James Ready to Everyone:
	I think that's an anecdotal example of peer-reviewers not being qualified to review the type of studies submitted...
12:33:27 From Amanda Pippitt (Millikin, she/her) to Everyone:
	This is so interesting. I'm wondering how to include these ideas in my freshman information literacy classes, where the professors often want me to discuss how double blind peer review is the gold standard
12:33:54 From Viki S to Everyone:
	Fantastic!  Love the way the PPT display!
12:34:14 From Hilary Baribeau to Everyone:
	Yes @Amanda, our faculty really want info lit to based around "peer reviewed" searches
12:34:23 From Bonnie Acton to Everyone:
	Post-publication peer review was mentioned.  How is that valuable?
12:34:36 From Viki S to Everyone:
	great observation
12:35:36 From Allegra Swift, UC San Diego to Everyone:
	Clarivate
12:36:56 From Rachel Yeates to Everyone:
	In your experiences, have there been differences in editing timelines between open and closed review? Or in periods of deadtime vs. time in active communication?
12:38:11 From Heather Hankins to Everyone:
	Do you think ongoing or post-publication open peer review could reduce the negative result publication bias? Where studies that cannot be confirmed or replicated after publication, but the articles that address that failure struggle to get published so the flawed study continues to receive attention.
12:38:23 From Julia Rodriguez to Everyone:
	I have experienced with both open and anonymous peer-review process. I think Librarians, especially in the last 5 years, are more likely than other fields to mentor each other over cutting each other down. I wonder if open peer review would disadvantage some authors in some fields?
12:40:26 From James Ready to Everyone:
	@Heather...that's why I always review https://retractionwatch.com/ for documents
12:40:30 From James Ready to Everyone:
	It's my daily read
12:41:52 From Bonnie Acton to Everyone:
	Yes, that was my question--how is it useful?
12:42:09 From Amy Hofer (she/her) to Everyone:
	I’m curious if any panelists have experience working with textbook manuscript review (as opposed to journal articles). Open peer review for open textbooks - pros and cons?
12:42:12 From Bonnie Acton to Everyone:
	Thanks!
12:44:46 From Ann to Everyone:
	Thank you!
12:45:03 From Rachel Yeates to Everyone:
	Thank you for attending! Please share your feedback with us at https://tinyurl.com/OAWeekSurvey2022
	
	More information about Open Access Week is available at our All Things Open webpage https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ato/2022openaccess/
12:45:06 From Amy Hofer (she/her) to Everyone:
	Thank you!
12:45:23 From Charlotte Roh to Everyone:
	Amy, textbooks don’t go through a peer review process because they’re typically not original research. They go through a review process for accuracy and/or usability.
12:47:19 From Bonnie Acton to Everyone:
	Thank you all so much!  Very informative!